“…some stupid glacier melting….”. Egad. Faux News is so out of touch, and will be left behind. I don’t know their readership numbers, but they have no credibility…zip!…not only with things enviro but (ahem) journalism as well.
Fair and Balanced, indeed.
Already, they are backpedaling on some other issues, due to decreasing viewership.
Did you notice they trot out the same discredited industry shills or hired politicos as “experts”?
No serious journalists (and educated folks) take them seriously, anyhow! Thanks
“…some stupid glacier melting….”. Egad. Faux News is so out of touch, and will be left behind. I don’t know their readership numbers, but they have no credibility…zip!…not only with things enviro but (ahem) journalism as well.
Fair and Balanced, indeed.
Already, they are backpedaling on some other issues, due to decreasing viewership.
Did you notice they trot out the same discredited industry shills or hired politicos as “experts”?
No serious journalists (and educated folks) take them seriously, anyhow! Thanks
Yes. The problem are the less educated folks who believe in that stuff. They votes, and GHG emissions count just as much as ours . . .