What a relief to know that I am not alone, in my struggle with green marital bliss! Yesterday, Prad – my husband, otherwise known as Green Guru in a series of earlier posts – half jokingly suggested that I read ‘Green with Worry‘, an article in the February issue of San Francisco Magazine. Here for your entertainment, are a few excerpts:
‘Lisa Behrens, a Berkeley mother, feels so torn about the extravagance of the nightly baths she needs to help her get to sleep that she’s started reusing her daughter’s bathwater. “It sounds gross, but she’s pretty clean,” Behrens says. Then, when Behrens is done, sometimes she fills up plastic milk containers with the dirty water and dumps it in the garden. Her husband has no idea about any of this. “When I ask him not to drain her tub, he doesn’t ask why.” The truth is, on the spectrum of eco-worry, most of us are probably closer to Behrens’ mate—not blissfully oblivious, exactly, and not in total denial, but not consumed with guilt or fear, either. Ironically, Behrens’ husband is a longtime environmental professional. “I think he knows one plastic soda bottle isn’t going to change the world,” she says.’
‘“It might start with an awareness of what’s going into your baby’s mouth, or the cost of gas, or that your husband is taking half-hour showers,” says Santa Barbara–based therapist Linda Buzzell. Some individuals and couples don’t even understand the true source of their edginess and conflict. “They might come in complaining about their sex lives,” says Point Reyes therapist Lesley Osman, only to discover that the underlying problem is “basic differences in how they approach this stuff.”’
‘Typical eco-worriers turn the blame inward—at our loved ones and ourselves. Take me, for example. At home, I refuse to buy chocolate candy, since traditional cocoa bean farming is environmentally destructive. “You’ve taken the joy out of Almond Joy,” my husband, Steve, mopes. He and my 10-year-old son, Sam, have also been complaining that their shirts, which I’ve begun air-drying, are scratchy. “This may be good for the environment,” says Steve—who, for some reason, isn’t constantly in a blind panic that the world is ending—“but I feel like you’re making us wear hairshirts.” “Hmph,” I think. “That’s the least they can do for the planet. Considering that Steve is a Diet Coke–drinking, “qui sera, sera” sort of guy, he takes it pretty well. He hardly grumbled when I replaced our plastic containers with glass, or when my efforts to save energy by turning off major appliances at night meant our TiVo didn’t record a month’s worth of shows. The couch has been more of a strain on our relationship, but I’m sure we’ll get through it. There’s a hole in our family room where a sofa used to be. Every time Sam, who has asthma, sat on it, he began to cough and wheeze. I Googled toxic and couch and found out more than even I wanted to: about the foam made from carcinogenic petrochemicals; the glues, paints, and Scotchgard with ingredients that also cause cancer; and neuro- and endocrine disruptors, whatever those are. After a few months of living with Sam’s reactions and my growing dismay, I called the store downtown, which took the couch back. We have no place to sit and watch television, but maybe that’s better. We won’t be using all that carbon with our terrible big-screen TV.’
‘For Elaine Hayes, an East Bay mother of two, trying to be so good all the time has left her not just joyless, but paralyzed and mentally exhausted. She and her husband, John, built a “green” house in 2006, but their eco-vigilance hardly stops there. There’s the question of what to have for dinner: Her husband is a vegan, and Elaine tries to avoid red meat, but at the fish counter, she says, “I cannot keep up with what fish is OK to eat, between the safe farming practices and the mercury.” She checks every label for GMO, soy, lecithin, and any added corn, soy, or canola oil. “This is on top of all the other things we check for: organic ingredients, no corn syrup, trans fats, high sugar content, overly processed wheat instead of whole grain, eggs laid from free and happy hens, chickens who were free-range and well fed during their short little lives.” She washes every plastic bag. “But then I wonder about the germs that don’t get washed out, and if I am sickening my family. I have secretly been known to rip holes in the bags, just to have an excuse to throw them out.” Sometimes she even runs the dishwasher when it’s not totally full. “I just say, ‘Fuck it,’ and I feel guilty and defiant at the same time. How sick is that, and who am I really defying?” Meanwhile, Hayes still hasn’t been able to create the home office she wants. “My desk is a mess, with piles of things I would like to put on a bulletin board, but the glues in regular bulletin boards are too toxic. I also am sitting on a crappy, really uncomfortable chair at my desk, which deters me from doing any long-term projects, because I need to find a nontoxic, environmentally friendly desk chair.” Underneath the lethargy, Hayes’s resentment is palpable—not directed at the corporate evildoers who pour their poisons into innocent, unsuspecting furniture, but at her husband. As hard as Hayes tries to limit her footprint on the planet, he wants her to tread even more softly. “He represents the whole movement in his dogmatic practices. He’ll silently change all the bulbs in the house, so when I go to turn on the light, which used to give a beautiful and pleasant glow, I am accosted by fluorescent lights’ weak and hideous green glow. It is enough to make me scream.” It also makes her feel more guilty—as if she needed that. “I feel like a spoiled, indulgent, and superficial energy hog because I just want my incandescent bulb.”
At this point in the vignettes, I have to slip in this video of Laurie David, the producer of Al Gore‘s documentary, ‘An Inconvenient Truth‘:
In case you don’t know it already, there has been some changes in the David household, since this video was filmed last year. Yes, that’s right, Laurie and David split up. It’s hard to tell whether Laurie’s eco-activism on the home front had anything to do with the breakup. When asked about his post-divorce life, Larry David did say: “I went home and turned all the lights on!”
To prevent such an unfortunate turn of events, maybe we would all do well to listen to Tokuda:
‘When she recently remarried, Tokuda and her groom went so far as to pledge tolerance and forgiveness for any enviro-obsessed behavior. “When I met John, he didn’t recycle,” Tokuda says. In the ceremony, she vowed “to love you even if you don’t recycle plastic bottles.” John, in turn, vowed “to love you even if you go in the garbage and pull out plastic bottles.”’
Does this sound familiar to any of you? How do you navigate green differences with your mate?
Hhhhmmmm.
My sense is that different persons and personalities should allow themselves to exercise their green stripes in their own particular ways. For example, it might be natural, or seemingly “necessary”, for one person to write e-mails to newspapers and politicians, regarding global warming, and wear a sweater at home to keep the heat down, but not reuse bathwater. The other partner may not be interested in writing e-mails but, instead, may be a great bathwater reuser. To each his (or her) own.
If that’s the case, how does the whole picture still fit together? Actually, I think that the awareness and conscientiousness of each party still help the other party. It’s moral support and inspiration. Even though the means are different, the care and vision are still, at least directionally, similar.
But, perhaps some parties need to divorce themselves of a different mindset, which is not unique to greenness: Feeling that the other person should be JUST like them. In some ways, that’s a problem that can, if it exists, be part of lots of activities.
Of course, there is still some percentage of the population that will be obsessive-compulsive.
This entire subject also reminds me of the criticism that some people aim at Al Gore because he has a large house, or more than one, or because he flies to places to receive things like Nobel Peace Prizes and Oscars and to give speeches and things like that. I, for one, don’t find the criticism compelling, and I think it’s just a distraction. In my view, he’s conveying the green message in his own way, trying the best that he can (I assume). Tipper probably has her own way. I have mine (and still working on it). And so forth.
The other day, I got a nice e-mail from someone who suggests using worms for household waste, uh, “processing.” I still have to read it more closely. It sounds like a neat idea, although I’d have to make sure that, when I travel, I wouldn’t need to take them to a pet hotel.
Our household is responsible for about 2,917kg CO2e annually each. This is 24% the Western average of 12,000 (of stuff households can control) annually.
Of our greenhouse gas emissions, the biggest contributors are in descending order: our coal-generated electricity, new clothes and books, burning petrol, burning natural gas for water heating and cooking, and our food.
If we changed from coal-fired to wind power, we could get rid of about 30% of our emissions in all, which would take us from 24% to 17% of average. The obstacle there is that the coal-fired electricity costs $0.1355/kWh, and the wind-generated stuff $0.1905/kWh. Now, if I’d suggested wind before we reduced our electricity use from 12kWh to 6kWh daily, I could have said, “yes it costs more but if at the same time we reduce usage, it’ll come out the same.” However, I had us reduce before suggesting we change to wind, so now she’s used to the lower bills… oops.
If we stopped using the car that’d save one-seventh of our emissions, though we’d add a bit if we substituted the bus for the trips the car usually takes. Overall, it’d be 10% less of our emissions, or down to 13% of Western average. But she’s hooked on the “convenience” of the car.
Aside from that, the biggest area we could reduce without significant expense or discomfort (I’m assuming we keep hot water and so on) is in the consumer goods. And I think that if I were to suggest my woman not buy new underwear from time to time there’d be trouble.
One infrequent but significant contributor to our emissions is her plane flights; once a year interstate to friends and family, and about twice every three years to somewhere in Asia. The interstate flight is like a whole month’s emissions for us, and the international one a year’s. I’m not going to persuade her away from that.
The way we cope with this is pretty simple. One common question others ask me is “why bother if most others aren’t bothering? What can one person do?” Apart from noting that there are a lot of others doing this sort of thing, I say simply, “if I don’t screw around on my woman, will that make the whole world faithful? If I return a wallet dropped in the street, will that make the whole world honest? If I offer a seat to a pregnant woman on a train, will that make the whole world polite? Of course not. But some things are right or wrong no matter what everyone else does. So I do the right thing, not because I expect the world to change or for my actions to make much difference, but because they’re the right thing to do.”
So that’s how we manage it – she takes her flights and drives her car, and I avoid doing so. Each of us follows our own convictions. Given that we have overall a quarter the average household emissions, I think she’s compromising more than me.
You both seem to be very wise men . . . Things seem to derail when control and obsessiveness get thrown into the mix.
the honesty and intensity of the response is proof of the quality of the subject here.
having been married enough years to homogenize reactions, i can surmise that, good things do grow for she who suffers long enough.
take one naturally frugal green, add one culturally impervious man and someone is bound to be shocked. What? you save this? Why? Who cares?
an entire book could be written on the psychological impact of diametrically opposed POVs. as for Jeff and Kiashu, homeostasis settles in as soon as each person in a hetero-green (one green,one not so) relationship realizes that example speaks louder than judgment or resentment.
it probably took years for my husband to shed wasteful habits, i did not change my low consumer ways, i could not have stopped taking the bath water to the garden, or saving the compost material, once aware, always there.
after reading this blog, i watched him save the coffee grounds, buy untreated filters, add the paper to the fireplace, sorry…it’s below zero, and we do need heat.
slowly, the pride seeped into our communal lives and made it’s own bonding cement, within personal tolerance or limits, each step measured by personal importance.
yes, we prefer the soft paper, yes several lights are incandescent. trade-offs, but our overall footprint is very small, and we both can enjoy it as long as i leave lots of room for ideas to become small habits into a larger lifestyle issue.
To men who integrate ecological conscience in their daily lives and to their women who balance the household microcosm with a conscience, peace.
You are right, Nadine, good things do grow if one is patient enough. It has taken me two long years to finally settle in with my mate, to the point where we have now reached a happy equilibrium. He has his green and not so green ways, and I have mine, and where we can’t meet, humor steps in.
’tis a journey that isn’t happening at this level as described here, in illinois folks taking bathwater to the garden, in subzero weather? We’d be making ice ponds!! Another thing I never thought of and as always enlightening
i speak to my daughter that it’s more of a future thing – what if you turned on the water and nothing came out, that’s your future and what if we did something to prevent that now – hard to fathom or really know but it gets the wheels going
Mother Earth aka Karen Hanrahan
http://www.bestwellnessconsultant.com
She and He
Regarding greenadine’s post and the richness of this thread, I have just a few observations.
First, the way I read greenadine’s great (and helpful) post, and coming from an “outside observer” standpoint, I sense that her post seems to illustrate the importance of persistence AND provide an example of the amazing power that one gender (not to be named) can often have over the other (not to be named). Of course, it often works the other way around too. But, something tells me that, in many cases, if a good relationship involves a Persistent Green She who is genuinely valued by a Less-Green He, the Less-Green He will start to become more green, if he’s wise. Of course, this process often takes a while, depending on the persistence of She and the wisdom and flexibility of He.
But, there is also a larger picture that people, and society in general, should understand, via the science-informed books on human happiness, human social behavior, and related matters. And that is this: Many of the underlying reasons why humans of both genders run around trying to acquire things and to have more than the neighbors, and to become more beautiful than the neighbors, have to do with (you guessed it!) our built-in tendency to do things that we (subconsciously) feel will be attractive to members of the opposite gender. So, while She might consciously want He to conserve, have a smaller place, get a small less-powerful car, reduce flights, and so forth, He (depending on who He is, and the situation) might have a tendency, naturally, to cling to the idea of a large house and fast car and so forth, without quite knowing why, which is to impress and attract She. And, of course, pressures in our culture entice and fuel that desire to have more, do more, buy more, be more beautiful, and so forth.
No need to mention that the Achilles’ heel of many people of both genders is shopping.
Great thread.
Umbria put on a fantastic webinar yesterday on this subject. The tallied responses on 160,000 blogs and identified all the levels of anxiety you detailed.
It was interesting because there were also able to tally men, women, gen X and boomers based on their AI and factoring word usage. Seems far fetched and yet we all know the difference in a person’s age and attitude if we talk to them on the phone, this is just the next step.
The results? Women care more about the environment than men. Men are more skeptical that Climate Change is real. I think they are going to post the full webinar for others to play.
Mary, this confirms some of earlier market research studies I commented on in earlier posts. Women tend to be ahead of men in terms of their awareness of global warming, and their willingness to take action. This is great for women led environmental initiatives such as yours and MyGreenPurse!
I can’t wait to get the whole results from Umbria!
Jeff, you wrote your comment before Mary’s information came through. Interesting convergence of thoughts . . .
I live with my boyfriend, who is instinctively less green around the house than I am (but who has changed his ways and thanks me for it). The one way in which I have pushed the envelope a bit is with my worm bin. He didn’t try and dissuade me from getting one started, but he didn’t advocate it himself.
Now that I have successfully managed the little guys for about 6 months now, I feel that it has brought about a mini-paradigm change for our (mostly his) friends. When I show people the bin- how easy it is, how it doesn’t smell, etc.- I like to think that it starts to make “real” trash seem really weird. And isn’t it true- we have created a world in which throwing stuff in a can in your kitchen and letting it rot is more “normal” than having it decompose like nature intended.
Anyhow, I am guessing that the net quantitative positive effect of the actual bin has been small, but showing it to people who wouldn’t have otherwise seen anything like it has had lasting impact. And I wouldn’t have had this opportunity of not for my boyfriend’s less green friends. Who needs to preach to the choir?
[…] in Northern California where I live. These women are on a mission and nobody can resist them, not even their husbands or children. They fill Whole Foods‘ parking lot with their Priuses, and are not shy about voicing their […]
[…] in Northern California where I live. These women are on a mission and nobody can resist them, not even their husbands or children. They fill Whole Foods‘ parking lot with their Priuses, and are not shy about voicing their newly […]