Exciting news this morning, on the water front. GreenBiz just published a report on WaterOrg, IBM’s ambitious idea regarding:
“an educational and perhaps advocacy organization focused on establishing the value of applying advanced sensing, information technology and modeling to water management in the USA.”
Peter Williams, Chief Technology Officer of IBM’s Big Green Innovations, and the brain behind WaterOrg, must have heard my earlier call . . .
I urge you all to read the detailed IBM proposal, and to contribute any ideas you may have on how to take this project to the next level. Personally, I can’t help but see a convergence between WaterOrg, and some of the broader efforts to organize and centralize sustainability solutions, such as discussed in our earlier thread on green wikis.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Social Networks, tagged Appropedia, contributors, engagement, green, Green Wikia, map, MIT Collaboratorium, online collaboration, Open Sustainability Network Camp, sustainability, sustainability wikis, Wikipedia, wikis on September 22, 2008 |
31 Comments »
Sustainability wikis such as Wikia Green or Appropedia have an important role to play, in the gathering of solutions for a sustainable future. The big challenge of course, is how to engage contributors into volunteering free content. As a content creator in the sustainability field, with hundreds of articles to my credit, all on blogs, I yet have to contribute to a collaborative platform. I started sharing some of my reasons in previous posts, here and here. In a nutshell:
- I am comfortable with blogging. It is what I know, and past the initial hurdle of setting up a blog, which by the way is very low, it’s been smooth sailing ever since.
- I like the feeling of being in control, and of having all my stuff in one place.
- When I contribute to other blogs, it is usually a boost for my recognition and helps enlarge my audience.
- Contributing to other blogs is a no brainer; hardly any setup is required, and I usually do a slight rewrite to address issue of duplicate content.
- I love the creative freedom of writing whatever I want whenever I want.
- My blog is also a social place to meet cyberfriends I have made along the way, and who keep coming back for more discussions.
- I get tremendous satisfaction from direct feedback from readers, particularly when something they read on my blog, either from me or other readers, is making an impact on their thinking or behaviors.
- There is lots of reciprocity going on amongst bloggers, thanks to linking, trackbacks, and pingbacks. As a result, the give and take feels very fair.
- Although I am very familiar with wikis, have consulted for wiki startups, and have started several private wikis of my own, I find making the move from blogging to contributing to public wiki platforms a huge step.
- First, there is the issue of time. If I could somehow export content that’s already on my blog, automatically, I would consider it.
- Second, is the problem of attribution, and ownership of content. Although, I am not one to hang on to my creative product with steel claws, it is very important to me that I be given credit for it.
- Third, is the issue of duplicate content, and how that might affect ranking of original content with search engines. If content is going to be exported automatically, and frequently, I would not have the time to do rewrites to avoid duplicate content problem.
- My blog is not my only source of content either. There are quite a few projects I have been working on, that are sitting either in some files on my desktop, or in Google groups discussions, and that I wouldn’t mind sharing, if I could just turn those over with one click.
The bottom line is, if you want my content, make it super easy for me, and make sure I get credit for it.
There is a huge pool of potential content providers like myself, scattered all over the Internet, and elsewhere, who could share their knowledge, under the right conditions:
Sustainability Wikis - Contributors' Engagement Map (Marguerite Manteau-Rao)
I will end by sharing my dream of the perfect sustainability wiki. Imagine a place where you can find nearly all that has been published about sustainable solutions all over the world. Imagine that contributors would not have to worry about adapting their content to the specific wiki requirements. Wiki editors could take care of that chore. Imagine that contributors could get credited each time, with ample linkage back to their original websites. Imagine a widget that would allow contributors to send their content automatically to the wiki in one click. Imagine that getting my content on the wiki would be all benefit for me, in addition to the reward from helping the greater community. Imagine . . .
Maybe this discussion can be continued at the upcoming Open Sustainability Network Camp that will take place in October, in San Francisco?
Read Full Post »
It was only a matter of time before open source made its way to science. InnoCentive has made the jump, and quite successfully, according to today’s article in the New York Times. InnoCentive connects companies, academic institutions, public sector and non-profit organizations, all hungry for breakthrough innovation, with a global network of more than 145,000 of the world’s brightest minds on the world’s first Open Innovation Marketplace™.
Cross-pollination and crowdsourcing, all wrapped up in one place for global problem solving, I love it! The world has never been smaller . . .
Read Full Post »
Posted in Consumer Research, Social Networks, tagged communities, David Holmgren, environmental psychology, Gallup, Google Talks, green, happiness, permaculture, Place and Happiness Survey, positive psychology, Richard Florida, sustainability, urban planning on June 20, 2008 |
3 Comments »
Richard Florida, professor of Business and Creativity at the University of Toronto, and the author of ‘Who’s Your City?: How the Creative Economy is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life‘, was on NPR Talk of the Nation yesterday. Richard Florida had a lot to say about a wide range of fascinating topics. Most interesting to me were the results of his Gallup Survey on Place and Happiness.
What makes people happy?:
- A job they love
- Social connections and relationships
- A good place to live
Richard Florida added some observations:
- Beyond a minimum threshold, income does not make a difference.
- People are suffering from fewer and fewer close social connections (with one the average)
- Good places to live all share the following five factors: 1) safety and good schools, 2) economic and social opportunities, 3) good mayoral and business leadership, 4) good across the board for a variety of people, 5) physically good in term of aesthetics, pleasant to live in.
What I find especially encouraging about this research, is that it supports visions for a more sustainable world
as well. This includes the need for strengthened communities
, and some ideas such as David Holmgren’s permaculture
that could be adapted to living in the big cities
. Note that accumulating more stuff, driving more, living in bigger houses, and more generally engaging in activities with a big footprint, are not part of this ‘make you happy’ list.
Read Full Post »